Free The Human and Machine Company: an AI strategy guide for CIOs who are done running pilots that go nowhere. Download free →
← All Offerings

Offering 01

Growth Strategy
and Sprint Plan

Identify your highest-leverage growth moves and sequence them into an executable plan, without overwhelming the organization or the calendar.

~6 wks
Typical timeline
8–20× ¹²
Minimum ROI target

¹ Ratio of documented client value to engagement fee across RLK engagements. Past results are not indicative of future outcomes. Terms.

² Bain & Company: strategy-focused capital allocators deliver 2.5× TSR vs. peers over 10-year periods.

Who This Is For

You're moving fast but not sure you're moving in the right direction.

This engagement is built for technology leaders who have growth pressure (revenue targets, board expectations, or a market window) but whose organizations keep drifting toward tactical execution rather than strategic sequencing.

The problem is rarely a lack of ideas. It's too many ideas with no forcing function to decide which ones get funded, staffed, and executed first.

  • CTO or VP Engineering
    Preparing to present a growth roadmap to the board and needs a defensible, sequenced plan rather than a feature list.
  • CEO or Founder
    At an inflection (new funding, a new market, or a competitive threat) and needs to move fast with limited bandwidth.
  • Chief Product Officer
    Under pressure to connect product investment to revenue and needs a prioritization framework that will hold up under scrutiny.
  • COO
    Tasked with operationalizing a growth plan that leadership has approved in concept but hasn't turned into a real execution sequence.

How It Works

Five moves. Six weeks. One document you'll actually use.

01
Diagnostic

Week 1–2. I map your current revenue base, growth vectors, competitive positioning, and organizational capacity. This is not a survey: it's structured interviews with the people who know where the real leverage is.

02
Driver Analysis

Week 2–3. We identify and size the two to four growth levers most likely to move the number you're being held to. Not the ones that are most interesting: the ones that are most executable given your actual resources.

03
Initiative Sequencing

Week 3–4. Prioritized against three variables: potential impact, implementation risk, and time to first signal. Nothing goes on the sprint plan that doesn't have an owner and a dollar number attached.

04
Sprint Plan Build

Week 4–5. A working document (not a deck) that specifies the first 90 days by initiative, with milestones, accountabilities, and decision gates. Your team can execute against this the week after delivery.

05
Alignment Session

Week 6. A working session with your leadership team to stress-test the plan, resolve sequencing disagreements, and lock priorities. I facilitate; the team owns the output.

What You Bring

Inputs

  • Access to 4–6 hours of leadership team time across the engagement
  • Revenue and unit economics data (we work with what you have, and this doesn't require a data warehouse)
  • Honest context on what's been tried, what's stalled, and where the real internal debates are
  • A clear target metric: the number this engagement is meant to move

What You Get

Outputs

GROWTH SPRINT PLAN
90-Day Execution Roadmap
INITIATIVE MATRIX
Priority & Sequencing
HIGH
Med
Med
LOW
DRIVER ANALYSIS
Revenue Lever Sizing
Lever A
Lever B
Lever C

Why RLK vs. Alternatives

What makes this different from everything else on the table.

RLK
Big Firm
Exec Coach
Senior strategist does the work
Analytical rigor
Accessible to mid-market budgets
Outcome-linked pricing
~6 week sprint model
Executable deliverables (not decks)
Technology leadership focus
varies

Business Case

What this work typically produces in dollars.

$2.4M

Net new revenue identified across three sequenced growth vectors for a $28M professional services firm. Plan was executed by internal team over 12 months following a 6-week sprint.

Professional Services · Growth Sprint
18 months cut to 6 weeks

Time-to-alignment on a product roadmap for a SaaS company. Prior process had produced competing priorities across product, engineering, and sales for a year and a half. One sprint resolved it.

SaaS · Roadmap Prioritization
Board confidence restored

Technology leader entering a new role inherited a stalled growth narrative. Within six weeks had a board-ready plan with sequenced initiatives, owners, and measurable milestones. No deck required.

Technology Leader · New Role Stabilization

Important Note

Every engagement and every company is different. The timelines, outputs, and results described on this page reflect typical engagements. Your actual scope, timeline, and outcomes will be shaped by your specific situation, organizational context, and goals. We define the success criteria together before the work begins, and I'll tell you clearly if the model isn't right for your situation.

Start the Conversation

Ready to build a plan you can actually execute?

Most engagements start with a single 30-minute call to map the problem. Tell me what's on your plate.

Connect with Ryan →